Hypertrophy
Narrative Review
2012
Cluster sets: Permitting greater mechanical stress without decreasing relative velocity
By G. Gregory Haff and Robert W. Burgess
Strength and Conditioning Journal, 34(5), pp. 67-72
Abstract
<h2>Abstract</h2> <p><a href="/terms/rest-pause/" class="term-link" data-slug="rest-pause" title="Cluster sets">Cluster sets</a> represent a training structure in which a traditional set of repetitions is subdivided into smaller clusters separated by intra-set rest periods of 15-45 seconds, allowing the maintenance of movement velocity and mechanical quality across repetitions that would otherwise decline under continuous fatigue. Haff and Burgess (2012) reviewed the theoretical and practical basis for cluster set training, evaluating its potential to permit greater total mechanical stress per session while preserving the high-velocity movement patterns essential for power and strength development. The defining advantage of cluster sets over traditional set structures is their capacity to sustain bar velocity and peak power output throughout a training session — qualities that deteriorate progressively as fatigue accumulates in conventional continuous sets. Evidence suggests that cluster sets can produce equivalent or superior strength and power adaptations compared to traditional sets when volume is equated, with particular advantages for high-load, velocity-sensitive training contexts. While their application to isolated <a href="/terms/muscle-hypertrophy/" class="term-link" data-slug="muscle-hypertrophy" title="hypertrophy">hypertrophy</a> goals remains secondary to traditional sets, cluster sets offer a compelling structural option for athletes seeking to develop maximal strength and explosive power alongside muscularity.</p>Introduction
<h2>Introduction</h2> <p>Traditional resistance training prescribes repetitions performed continuously without rest within a set, with rest periods occurring exclusively between sets. This structure is intuitive and administratively simple, but it carries an inherent limitation: as repetitions accumulate within a set, mechanical and <a href="/terms/metabolic-stress/" class="term-link" data-slug="metabolic-stress" title="metabolic fatigue">metabolic fatigue</a> cause movement velocity to decline, peak force output to decrease, and bar acceleration to diminish [1]. For sports performance training — where the velocity and explosive quality of movement are as important as the total load moved — this fatigue-induced velocity decrement represents a meaningful compromise.</p> <p><a href="/terms/rest-pause/" class="term-link" data-slug="rest-pause" title="Cluster sets">Cluster sets</a> were developed as a structural solution to this problem. By inserting brief intra-set rest intervals (typically 15-45 seconds between clusters of 2-5 repetitions), cluster set training allows the neuromuscular system to partially recover between mini-sets, enabling subsequent repetitions to be performed with greater velocity, force, and technical integrity than would be possible in an uninterrupted continuous set [2]. The net effect is a training session that accumulates more total mechanical work at higher velocities than traditional set structures allow.</p> <p>The concept of cluster sets is not new — variants have been described in strength coaching literature for decades under names including "rest-pause," "French contrast," and "structured rest-pause" methods. However, Haff and colleagues helped formalize the terminology and provide a mechanistic basis for cluster set classification and prescription [3].</p> <p>The classification of cluster sets proposed by Haff and Burgess encompasses three primary variants:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Cluster sets:</strong> Equal-length rest intervals between equally-sized repetition clusters within a set (e.g., 3 reps, 20-second rest, 3 reps, 20-second rest, 3 reps).</li> <li><strong>Undulating cluster sets:</strong> Rest intervals or cluster sizes that vary systematically within a set to match fatigue profiles.</li> <li><strong>Accommodated cluster sets:</strong> Load adjusted within the set alongside intra-set rest to optimize velocity across all clusters.</li> </ol> <p>This review focuses primarily on the standard cluster set format and its implications for strength, power, and hypertrophic development.</p>Evidence Review
<h2>Evidence Review</h2> <h3>Velocity Maintenance</h3> <p>The most consistent finding in the cluster set literature is their superior capacity to maintain movement velocity relative to traditional sets at equivalent loads and volumes. Studies using linear position transducers and velocity-tracking devices have demonstrated that mean concentric velocity during the final repetitions of traditional sets can decline by 30-50% from the first repetition, while cluster set protocols maintain velocity within 10-15% of initial values across the entire set cluster [4]. This velocity preservation is mechanistically attributable to the partial restoration of <a href="/terms/phosphocreatine/" class="term-link" data-slug="phosphocreatine" title="phosphocreatine">phosphocreatine</a> (PCr) stores during intra-set rest periods — even 20-30 seconds of rest is sufficient to resynthesize 50-80% of depleted PCr, restoring rapid <a href="/terms/adenosine-triphosphate/" class="term-link" data-slug="adenosine-triphosphate" title="ATP">ATP</a> availability for subsequent high-intensity contractions [5].</p> <h3>Peak Power Output</h3> <p>Peak power output, calculated as the product of force and velocity at the most mechanically advantageous point of a movement, represents a key outcome for power athletes. Research by Hardee et al. demonstrated that <a href="/terms/rest-pause/" class="term-link" data-slug="rest-pause" title="cluster sets">cluster sets</a> (4 reps with 30-second intra-set rest) maintained peak power output across repetitions at 80% of <a href="/terms/one-repetition-maximum/" class="term-link" data-slug="one-repetition-maximum" title="1RM">1RM</a> in the power clean, whereas traditional sets showed a 12-15% decline in peak power by the fourth repetition [6]. Similar patterns have been reported for the squat and deadlift, suggesting that cluster sets offer a generalizable advantage for heavy compound movements.</p> <h3>Strength Adaptations</h3> <p>Longitudinal evidence on cluster sets and maximal strength development is more limited. Available data suggest that when total <a href="/terms/training-volume/" class="term-link" data-slug="training-volume" title="training volume">training volume</a> is equated, cluster set and traditional set protocols produce comparable one-<a href="/terms/repetition-maximum/" class="term-link" data-slug="repetition-maximum" title="repetition maximum">repetition maximum</a> (1RM) strength gains over 6-8 week training periods [7]. Some studies have reported marginally greater strength gains with cluster sets, potentially attributable to the higher mechanical quality of repetitions maintained throughout the session. The absence of strong evidence for cluster superiority in strength development suggests that the primary advantage lies in the training quality facilitated, rather than a distinct physiological stimulus.</p> <h3><a href="/terms/muscle-hypertrophy/" class="term-link" data-slug="muscle-hypertrophy" title="Hypertrophy">Hypertrophy</a> Outcomes</h3> <p>Evidence for differential hypertrophic effects of cluster versus traditional sets is sparse. The available data indicate that cluster sets and traditional sets produce equivalent muscle hypertrophy when volume is equated, consistent with the broader principle that total <a href="/terms/mechanical-tension/" class="term-link" data-slug="mechanical-tension" title="mechanical tension">mechanical tension</a> and <a href="/terms/metabolic-stress/" class="term-link" data-slug="metabolic-stress" title="metabolic stress">metabolic stress</a> accumulated per session — regardless of how repetitions are distributed — are the primary determinants of hypertrophic adaptation [8]. For practitioners whose primary goal is hypertrophy, cluster sets offer no clear advantage over traditional sets, though they may be advantageous in contexts where maintaining training quality under high loads is prioritized.</p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Outcome</th> <th>Cluster Sets</th> <th>Traditional Sets</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Velocity maintenance</td> <td>Superior</td> <td>Inferior</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Peak power output</td> <td>Higher</td> <td>Lower (fatigue-dependent)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total mechanical work</td> <td>Comparable</td> <td>Comparable</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Maximal strength</td> <td>Comparable</td> <td>Comparable</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Hypertrophy</td> <td>Comparable</td> <td>Comparable</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Session duration</td> <td>Longer</td> <td>Shorter</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>Discussion
<h2>Discussion</h2> <h3>The Specificity Principle Applied to Set Structure</h3> <p>The pattern emerging from the cluster set literature reflects the principle of training specificity: <a href="/terms/rest-pause/" class="term-link" data-slug="rest-pause" title="cluster sets">cluster sets</a> produce advantages in the qualities they specifically develop. Because cluster sets allow more repetitions to be performed at high velocities, they generate more training stimulus for velocity-specific neural adaptations — faster <a href="/terms/motor-unit/" class="term-link" data-slug="motor-unit" title="motor unit">motor unit</a> recruitment, enhanced rate of force development, and improved coordination of high-velocity movement patterns [9]. These adaptations are of particular relevance to athletes in power sports such as weightlifting, sprinting, throwing events, and team sports requiring explosive actions.</p> <p>For training goals that do not specifically require velocity maintenance — such as general <a href="/terms/muscle-hypertrophy/" class="term-link" data-slug="muscle-hypertrophy" title="hypertrophy">hypertrophy</a> in bodybuilding contexts — cluster sets provide no demonstrated advantage over traditional sets. The hypertrophic stimulus is determined by <a href="/terms/mechanical-tension/" class="term-link" data-slug="mechanical-tension" title="mechanical tension">mechanical tension</a> and <a href="/terms/metabolic-stress/" class="term-link" data-slug="metabolic-stress" title="metabolic stress">metabolic stress</a> accumulated per session, and both set structures achieve comparable levels of these stimuli when total volume is equated.</p> <h3>Practical Trade-Off: Quality vs. Duration</h3> <p>The primary practical disadvantage of cluster sets is their greater session duration. Inserting 15-45 second intra-set rest intervals into what would otherwise be continuous sets adds substantial time to a training session. A traditional set of 8 repetitions at constant load might take 20-25 seconds; an equivalent cluster set (3+3+2 with 20-second intra-set rests) would take approximately 60-70 seconds, nearly tripling the per-set time investment [10].</p> <p>This trade-off — higher mechanical quality at the cost of session efficiency — defines the appropriate niche for cluster sets. In programs where training time is constrained and hypertrophy is the primary goal, traditional sets or time-efficient techniques such as <a href="/terms/superset/" class="term-link" data-slug="superset" title="supersets">supersets</a> are more appropriate. When training quality and movement velocity are paramount — as in the strength-speed block of a periodized athletic preparation program — cluster sets provide a structurally superior option.</p> <h3>Integration with Velocity-Based Training</h3> <p>Cluster sets pair naturally with velocity-based training (VBT) methodologies, in which real-time velocity feedback guides load and repetition decisions. In VBT systems, a minimum velocity threshold (typically 90% of maximum velocity for a given load) can serve as a stopping criterion within each cluster, ensuring that every repetition meets a mechanical quality standard before rest is taken [11]. This integration allows cluster sets to be individualized based on real-time fatigue rather than predetermined repetition counts — a more sophisticated prescription than fixed-rep cluster sets, though requiring appropriate technology.</p> <h3><a href="/terms/phosphocreatine/" class="term-link" data-slug="phosphocreatine" title="Phosphocreatine">Phosphocreatine</a> Resynthesis as the Mechanism</h3> <p>The mechanistic explanation for velocity maintenance in cluster sets centers on the well-established kinetics of phosphocreatine (PCr) resynthesis. PCr is the primary immediate energy substrate for maximal-intensity muscular contractions, and its depletion during high-intensity effort is the primary cause of rapid fatigue and velocity decline within a set. Because PCr resynthesis is approximately 50% complete within 30 seconds and nearly complete within 3-4 minutes, even the brief intra-set rest periods characteristic of cluster sets are sufficient to meaningfully restore PCr and thereby reset the mechanical quality of subsequent repetitions [12].</p>Practical Recommendations
<h2>Practical Recommendations</h2> <h3>Who Should Use <a href="/terms/rest-pause/" class="term-link" data-slug="rest-pause" title="Cluster Sets">Cluster Sets</a></h3> <p>Cluster sets are most appropriate for:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Athletes in power-dependent sports:</strong> Weightlifters, throwers, sprinters, and team sport athletes for whom explosive force production is a primary performance determinant.</li> <li><strong>Strength athletes during power phases:</strong> Powerlifters and strongmen incorporating cluster sets during training blocks emphasizing speed-strength or dynamic effort work.</li> <li><strong>Intermediate-to-advanced trainees</strong> seeking to accumulate high-quality repetitions at 80-90%+ of <a href="/terms/one-repetition-maximum/" class="term-link" data-slug="one-repetition-maximum" title="1RM">1RM</a> without the velocity and power decrements that accompany traditional continuous sets.</li> </ul> <p>Traditional sets remain the recommended structure for bodybuilders and fitness enthusiasts primarily focused on <a href="/terms/muscle-hypertrophy/" class="term-link" data-slug="muscle-hypertrophy" title="hypertrophy">hypertrophy</a>, given that cluster sets provide no demonstrated superiority for muscle growth.</p> <h3>Set Structure Recommendations</h3> <p><strong>Standard cluster set prescription:</strong></p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Cluster Set Type</th> <th>Repetitions per Cluster</th> <th>Intra-Set Rest</th> <th>Total Clusters</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Strength</td> <td>1-3</td> <td>30-45 seconds</td> <td>3-5</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Power</td> <td>2-4</td> <td>20-30 seconds</td> <td>3-4</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Strength-Hypertrophy</td> <td>3-5</td> <td>15-20 seconds</td> <td>3-4</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Load selection:</strong> Cluster sets are most effective at loads of 70-90% of 1RM. Below 70%, the velocity decrement in traditional sets is modest enough that cluster sets offer minimal advantage. Above 90%, clusters of 1-2 repetitions approximate traditional heavy singles training.</p> <h3>Exercise Selection</h3> <p>Cluster sets are best suited to: - <strong>Olympic lifts:</strong> Power clean, power snatch, hang variations — where velocity is the defining performance quality - <strong>Barbell compound movements:</strong> Back squat, front squat, deadlift, bench press — where maintaining bar speed is crucial for neural adaptation - <strong>Jump and plyometric exercises:</strong> Depth jumps, box jumps — where fatigue-induced velocity decrement is particularly detrimental</p> <p>Cluster sets are not recommended for isolation exercises (bicep curls, lateral raises) where velocity considerations are secondary to <a href="/terms/metabolic-stress/" class="term-link" data-slug="metabolic-stress" title="metabolic stress">metabolic stress</a> and <a href="/terms/mechanical-tension/" class="term-link" data-slug="mechanical-tension" title="mechanical tension">mechanical tension</a>.</p> <h3>Monitoring Velocity During Cluster Sets</h3> <p>Where velocity-monitoring devices (GymAware, PUSH Band, or Tendo unit) are available, using mean concentric velocity as a set termination criterion provides the most individualized and scientifically grounded approach to cluster set prescription [13]. A practical threshold is to terminate a cluster when velocity drops below 90% of the first-repetition velocity — this ensures every repetition retains high-quality mechanical stimulus.</p> <h3><a href="/terms/periodization/" class="term-link" data-slug="periodization" title="Periodization">Periodization</a> of Cluster Sets</h3> <p>In periodized training programs, cluster sets are most effectively positioned during: - <strong>Power development blocks</strong> (4-6 weeks): Primary set structure for major lifts - <strong>Strength-speed phases</strong>: Combined with accommodating resistance (bands, chains) to emphasize the acceleration phase - <strong>Transition blocks</strong>: Bridge between high-volume hypertrophy training and maximal-strength peaking phases</p>관련 논문
근비대
2021
운동할 시간이 없다고? 시간 효율적인 근력 및 근비대 훈련 프로그램 설계: 내러티브 리뷰
11개 공유 용어
근비대
2017
주간 저항 훈련 볼륨과 근육량 증가 사이의 용량-반응 관계: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석
7개 공유 용어
근비대
2022
저항 훈련에서 실패 근접도가 골격근 비대에 미치는 영향: 메타분석을 포함한 체계적 문헌고찰
6개 공유 용어
근비대
2019
저항 훈련 볼륨은 훈련된 남성에서 근비대를 촉진하지만 근력은 아니다
6개 공유 용어
유산소
2012
스프린트 인터벌 훈련: 유산소 및 무산소 능력 효과
5개 공유 용어